4 Comments

What is your response to this, Rupert?

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/uk-bans-covid-vaccines-for-all-kids

"If you know any anti-vaxxers on social media, scroll over to their feed and look for some sciency-looking research that warns of the alleged dangers of COVID vaccines. Copy the name of the first author listed on the paper and stick it in Google. Does he or she have relevant credentials?"

Information comes to us from many sources, it doesn't just exist in statistics and scientific papers. When we work out the truth of something we need to take into consideration all the information we have access to. When we were first told of an alleged covid pandemic, I didn't know a jab was coming but had I known I would have decided against getting it then and there on account of the images against reality we were shown of people falling flat on their faces and lying on the ground and on hospital floors https://twitter.com/rachadchahine/status/1220785179146563585. These were clear signs of a psyop followed by a few others.

I have very little interest in people's credentials these days as I know they mean so little, what I'm interested in is their argument and the argument against what they say if there is one and then what their argument is against the argument against theirs. I knew there would be no special virus before a number of doctors and scientists came out and said there wasn't so I wasn't going to get the jab regardless of safety and efficacy because I knew it wasn't a matter of safety or efficacy it was a matter of requirement - there simply is no requirement for the jab regardless of anything else.

Two fundamental rules of critical thinking:

1. Aim to prove your hypothesis wrong - this does not mean blindly accepting what is said in scientific papers. This means engaging with material that comes out against the mainstream narrative with a reasonable degree of rigour

2. Confine your analysis to the most unarguable-with data

Here are two pieces of very common sense unarguable-with data:

1. If we weren't told about a pandemic 24/7 by goverment and media we'd have zero clue there was one.

2. As covid doesn't have a distinctive set of symptoms and there is no gold standard test (thus it is not a clinically diagnosed condition), if testing stopped tomorrow there would be no way of knowing if someone had covid or nothing at all or a cold, flu, pneumonia whatever.

Testing stops, covid effectively disappears.

Expand full comment